Martin joined me on this episode to discuss how anarchists of the left and right can come together. Martin has more of a background in left anarchism and I right. So together we are able to really get to the bottom of some of the division between anarchists.
From Samuel Konkin3 to Tom Woods to John Vibes the strategy is becoming clear. Freedom Cells! Through Relational Anarchy we can better cooperate and build cells that allow for the growth of a counter economy and law/justice.
Did Trump just flip-flop or did the "Deep State" get him right where they want him? Either way many of his supporters of the libertarian or Alt-Right flavor seem to be displeased with how things are going down in Syria.
If you are looking for more info on the White Helmets check out....
How far does Compassionate Anarchy go? Is there room for defense against other perspectives using coercion or violence?
Sterlin Luxan joins me to discuss the tools of Compassionate Anarchy. We talked about how to use logic compassionately and how the two main schools of economic thought might work together! Sterlin also provided some interesting info on the side effects of arguing about what is right.
Counter economics is the best strategy for anarchists to make the state obsolete. Compassionate anarchy is how we swell our ranks so that we can more effectively carry out that mission and maintain a free society after the state.
How can we apply Lysander Spooner's two writings, A Plan for the Abolition of Slavery and To the Non-Slaveholders of the South, to the fight against statist slavery of today?
Does it seem like Reason and Logic just don't quite cut it when you're trying to convince a statist to become an anarchist? Sterlin Luxan runs Psychologic Anarchist where he discusses using compassionate and relational anarchism as a better approach to reaching others.
What is Agorism and what qualifies a person or action as Agorist? I get into the answer to those questions and a great quote on the matter in this episode!
"The recognition of the libertarian incompatibility of statist means to anti-statist ends was the first agorist insight. following that the new agorist looked for the proper means to achieve a free society or at least a fully libertarian society. They sought market means only." Samuel Konkin 3
What is the biggest piece of news since Trump's inauguration? Could it be that the puppet strings of the deep state have been partially revealed?
This is for Agorists and their critics alike! What is the focus of Agorism? Does Agorism claim an individual should not vote or should use welfare?
This seems like a cut and dry issue, right? I'm not too sure about that. I tie in some thoughts about what happens with public property after government from a previous episode and get down to the heart of the matter.
My focus on this debate isn't just to highlight good or bad arguments for or against the state, but to attempt to point out errors in communication that seem to leave the message hanging in the balance.
James V Baker joined me on this episode to discuss what happened in Dearborn Michigan recently when he walked into the Police Station practicing his legal open carry rights. We also get into a discussion of what exactly an Independent Police Auditor is and how he goes about being one himself.
Trump Signed 14 EOs in his first week including a ban on entrance to the USA for certain country's citizens. He wants to tax Mexican imports to fund the wall and the liberals of Cali want to secede!
People are loosing their minds and Trump is wasting no time using his new found power and setting his agenda in motion. Here is my take on what's been going on!
Does a person who commits a violation of right loose their rights? My response goes down a road full of thoughts about different scenarios and types of responses to violence.
An Agorist Primer written by Samuel Edward Konkin the third is a great book to get some direction for taking counter economic action. In this episode I give a basic summary and supply some quotes to discuss some of the topics brought up in the book.
What is going on here?! is this really a topic of converastion? Apparently, Yes and I address it here in this episode of AAC.
Is there a line in the sand as far as what actions can be used to defend based on the violence committed? If there is something like a line in the sand I describe it here. A line in the sand may be strong phrasing. Call it what you will. Let's get into the conversation!
I'm sure you've seen/heard some of the debates about borders during the past election year. Here is my take on what will happen with borders after the state is abolished or obsolete.
"Russia hacked the US Power Grid!... Up next we have some more fake news to report before we tell you which news outlets report fake news. Don't change the channel!"
Trump trusts courier services for important info over email. The Holm's declined a birth certificate and SSN for their child and are now fighting to get her back! BitCoin breaks $1,000, but what strategy should anarchists use in attempting to make government money go obsolete?
I recently listened to Tom Woods host Bob Murphy and Walter Block on his PodCast. They debated the topic of accepting government money. I'm not sure any of them hit the nail on the head. Here's my response.